Advice sets out the PCA's expectations in relation to MRO-compliant proposals

The advice reiterates the key point that a MRO proposal does not have to be by way of a new agreement, stressing that it is the content rather than the form that is important.

Whatever the form of the individual MRO proposal, the terms have to be consistent with the core principles of the pubs code - that there should be fair, lawful dealing and tied pub tenants should be no worse off than they would be if they were not tied.

The advice states: “MRO is not the same as a negotiation on the open market and the pub-owning business should not take advantage of the fact that a tied pub tenant has limited negotiating power.

“The PCA will be likely to find it unreasonable for the pub-owning business to offer unattractive MRO tenancy terms if the intention is to persuade the tenant to stay tied.”

The PCA expects pub-owning businesses to have meaningful negotiations with their tenants seeking an MRO tenancy option, and that tenants should not need to rely on PCA arbitration to get their Code MRO rights. The advice reiterates that arbitration referrals should be the exception and not the norm moving forwards.

Eliminating unnecessary barriers 

Newby commented: “I understand that both sides of the industry have been looking for clarity on this issue and I am very pleased that following arbitration awards made by the deputy PCA and myself we can now provide this statutory advice.

“The ability for a tied tenant to go free of tie is an important right introduced by the pubs code. Tenants have been facing high costs in pursuing MRO and we need to ensure these unnecessary barriers are eliminated.

“This advice gives a strong yet simple steer on what pub-owning businesses can reasonably ask from their tenants in a MRO-compliant tenancy and is a major step forward in delivering the MRO rights that Parliament has given tenants. I expect it to lead to meaningful negotiations that mean arbitration becomes the exception in the future.”

Dickie added: “The code is legally complex and uncertainty surrounding the meaning of the MRO process has caused frustration. This advice will be a useful tool in clarifying, for the benefit of all, what the code requires and how its two core principles should be applied in practice to the MRO proposal.

“It is designed to support effective, balanced negotiation between tenants and pub-owning businesses, and reduce the number of cases that are referred for arbitration. I am confident that the arbitration process will now more efficiently and proportionately resolve any remaining MRO disputes where the parties cannot reach an agreement.”

Full advice can be found here​.