Stuart Neame takes Shepherd Neame to court

Family relations at Shepherd Neame came back under the spotlight this week after news that Stuart Neame has taken the regional brewer to an industrial tribunal.

Mr Neame is claiming constructive dismissal. The former deputy chairman left the company last year following a very public bust-up after more than 30 years with the business.

When he resigned he said the company was losing £2.5m a year, that it was spending too much on advertising its ale brand Spitfire, and paying too much attention on growing volumes at the expense of profit.

He believed the business should quit brewing to focus on its pubs business and it would make more money as a "one man and his dog" property company.

His claims were dismissed by the board as a "crazy idea".

The arguments have spilled over into an industrial tribunal. Andrew Hochhauser QC, representing Shepherd Neame, said Stuart's behaviour was "underhand, calculating and manipulative".

He said Stuart made the accusations after it became clear that he would not succeed Bobby Neame, 70, as chairman.

In a witness statement chief executive Jonathan Neame responded to Stuart's loss-making accusations.

He said: "Stuart Neame himself was one of the directors who signed off accounts (presented by company auditor Ernst & Young) as representing a fair and true view of Shepherd Neame affairs."

He also accused Stuart of wanting to cause maximum embarrassment to the board, especially the chairman. The hearing has now concluded and both parties will be informed of the tribunal's decision by post.

Related articles:​

Stuart Neame affair costs Sheps £615k (24 March 2004)

Stuart Neame hits back at "libellous" claims (6 November 2003)

Stuart Neame resigns from Shepherd Neame (30 October 2003)